well, not 3d, but perspectival, how about that?

Let the developers know what you think of the software and what can be done to either improve the CFDG language or the Context Free program.

Moderators: MtnViewJohn, chris, mtnviewmark

Post Reply
dan90
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:54 pm
Location: Australia
Contact:

well, not 3d, but perspectival, how about that?

Post by dan90 »

I'm not really intersted in doing true 3d with CFDG. there are other tools for that, and i reckon it would lose a lot in elegance.

but I would like to humbly propose perspectival transforms for my plain ol' 2d shapes. you know, the projections of 3d transforms applied to 2d shapes, if yer following me. together with the new z-ordering, I think that would be cooler than 3d. and indistinguishable for many purposes.

did that make sense as a proposal?

Guest

Post by Guest »

Interesting idea. The user could specify a camera position in the abstract coordinate space. The default camera position would be <0, 0, +infinity>.

Music2000
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:38 pm
Location: London

Post by Music2000 »

Nice idea :)

Post Reply