About the PATH/ARCTO syntax

Let the developers know what you think of the software and what can be done to either improve the CFDG language or the Context Free program.

Moderators: MtnViewJohn, chris, mtnviewmark

Post Reply
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:17 am

About the PATH/ARCTO syntax

Post by Zirgion »

I'm probably alone with this "problem", but I feel that using positive and negative "r" in ARCTO would be much more logical than the current "p" attribute.

Just my two cents.

User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 875
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 2:26 pm
Location: Mountain View, California

Post by MtnViewJohn »

Hey that's a great idea. A negative radius would flip from counter clockwise to clockwise. You would still need the "p" to draw arcs with more than 180 degrees of span.

Post Reply